Key Challenges: Developing best practices / standards of metadata and predate (interpretive data) so that 3D content is interoperable now and in the future.

This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Hannah Scates Kettler Hannah Scates Kettler 1 year, 5 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #5195
    Profile photo of Alyson A. Gill Alyson A. Gill 
    Keymaster

    What are the action items?

    #5231
    Profile photo of Hannah Scates Kettler Hannah Scates Kettler 
    Participant
    • White Paper on what we want to preserve of 3D cultural heritage materials and possible workflows. (all participants in Institute)
    • Visual Resources Committee  – VRA Core and ArcheoCore (Lynn C. to talk with group – engage Piotr and others?)
    • Environmental Scan of what other industries are doing with 3D (medical, private companies that are preserving UI) (Ed)

     

    #5345
    Profile photo of Hannah Scates Kettler Hannah Scates Kettler 
    Participant

    Necessary Metadata ideas:

    1. Collection method (free-3D modeling, LiDAR, Photogrammetry etc)
    2. Program used to save data
    3. explication of file format
    4. creator(s)
    5. date
    6. program/language necessary to visualize 3D
    7. paradata (txt readme?, journal article?)
    8. Digital Object Identifyer
    9. copyright statement (ideally CC)

     

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?